Integrating Industry Specific Training into Mainstream University Computer Science Curriculum: Case of SMU

Session Time and Location

Thu, 7 Jun 2018
11:15am to 12:45pm
Room: Room:
Oakwood A
Session Track
Session Format


This paper outlines the importance of integrating the industry-specific training (IST) into mainstream university Computer Science Curriculum (CSC), with special reference to the Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (SMU), South Africa. This integration involves mixing what is available in the CSC and useful aspects from industry. Such a practice of IST content could significantly improve the quality of the Computer Science (CS) graduate. It also instils some industrial expertise in academics and students. The direct contact of industry experts with students can be a selling point when the industry considers recruitment of employees because it incorporates early mentorship of students into the world of work. Some benefits of the proposed approach are value addition, cost saving, empowerment and bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and industrial practices.

  • Session References +
    Abeysekera, L. & Dawsona, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34 (1): 1-14. Altemueller, L. & Lindquist, C. (2017). Flipped classroom instruction for inclusive learning. British Journal of Special Education, 44 (3): 341-358. Alvarez, B. (2011). Flipping the classroom: Homework in class, lessons at home. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 77 (8): 18-21. Arnold-Garza, S. (2014). The Flipped Classroom Teaching Model and its use for Information Instruction. Communications in Information Literacy 8(1), 7-23. Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. [Available Online] < > [Last Accessed 26 February 2018] Boyd, S. (2018). Integrated Curriculum: Definitions, Benefits and Example. [Available Online] < > [Last Accessed 30 January 2018] Brown, B.A. (2016). Understanding the Flipped Classroom: Types, Uses and Reactions to a Modern and Evolving Pedagogy. Culminating Projects in Teacher Development: St Cloud State University Drake, S.M. & Burns, R.C. (2004). Meeting Standards through Integrated Curriculum. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. [Available Online] < file:///F:/2018/Research%202017/2018/What%20Is%20Integrated%20Curriculum_.html > [Last accessed 6 March 2018] Eynon, B., Gambino, L.M. & Török, J. (2014). Reflection, Integration, and ePortfolio Pedagogy. [Available Online] < > [Last Accessed 4 March 2018] Fullan, M. & Striegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell. Garrison, D.R & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended Learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7: 95-105. Hungwe, T. & Dagada, R. (2013). Blended Learning Approach - Perceptions in higher Education. Saarbricken, Deutschland, Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. Lake, K. (1994). Integrated Curriculum. School Improvement Research Series: New York: publisher. Large, M.J. Platt, G. & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1): 30-43. Ormrod, J.E. (2003). Educational Psychology: Developing Learners (4th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Osguthorpe, R.T. & Graham, C.R. (2003). Blended Learning Environments. Definitions and Directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3): 227-233. Singh, H. (2003). Building Effective Blended Learning Programs. Educational Technology, 43 (6): 51-54. Saedah, S. & Wye, C. (2015). Futuristic Business Studies Curriculum: A Framework. [Available Online] [Last accessed 30 January 2018] Yujing, N. (2015). Influence of Flipped Classroom on Learner’s Empowerment – A study based on English Writing Courses in China. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 12: 1-27.