Measuring Transparency: A Learning-Focused Assignment Rubric

Session Time and Location

Wed, 6 Jun 2018
2:00pm to 3:00pm
Room: Room:
Dunwoody A
Session Track
Session Format


By combining recommendations for effective assignment design with principles of transparency in learning and teaching and the value-expectancy theory of achievement motivation, we have developed a rubric capable of assessing the quality of and guiding the design of assignments. The rubric defines broad criteria characteristic of well-designed assignments; breaks the criteria down into a set of concrete, measurable components; and suggests what evidence for each component might look like. While valid for major, signature assignments, it is flexible enough to accommodate a diverse range of levels, disciplines, institutions, and learning environments yet nuanced enough to provide summative information to educational developers using the tool for research purposes and formative feedback to instructors interested in gauging the quality and focus of their assignments.


  • Session References +

    Aronson, J., Fried, C., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38,113–125.6.

    Bean, J. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Nilson, L. B. (2010). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors. 3rd edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Paunesku, D. et al. (2015). Mindset interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement.” Psychological Science, 26, 6, 784-793.7.

    Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes among minority students. Science, 331, 1447–1451.5.

    Walvoord and Anderson. 2010. Effective Grading. 2nd ed. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

    Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.

    Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

    Winkelmes, M.-A., Bernacki, M., Butler, J., Zochowski, M., Golanics, J., &, Weavil, K. H. (2016). A teaching intervention that increases underserved college students’ success. Peer Review, Winter/Spring.

    Winkelmes, M.-A., Copeland, D. E., Jorgensen, E., Sloat, A., Smedley, A., Pizor, P., Johnson, K., & Jalene, S. (2015). Benefits (some unexpected) of transparently designed assignments. National Teaching & Learning Forum, 24(4), 4-6.