The role of academic developers in embedding high-impact undergraduate research and inquiry in mainstream higher education: Twenty years’ reflection

Session Time and Location

Date:
Fri, 8 Jun 2018
Time:
Time:
9:45am to 10:45am
Room: Room:
Maplewood A
Session Track
Session Format

Speaker(s)

This workshop focuses on the changing role of academic developers in supporting and influencing undergraduate research and inquiry (UGRI), a high-impact activity. We examine the levels at which academic developers can influence UGRI practices by distinguishing between staff and student practices; disciplinary and departmental practices and policies; institutional practices and policies; and national and international practices and policies. Drawing on our international experiences over the last 20 years, we discuss the widening of academic development practice and consider who the academic developers are, now and in the future, when it comes to UGRI in mainstream HE. 
  • Session References +
    Brew, A. (2007). Research and teaching from the students’ perspective, International policies and practices for academic enquiry: An international colloquium held at Marwell conference centre, Winchester, UK, 19–21 April. Brew, A., & Jewell, E. (2012). Enhancing quality learning through experiences of research-based learning: Implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 17(1), 47-58. Brew, A., & Mantai, L. (2017). Academics’ perceptions of the challenges and barriers to implementing research-based experiences for undergraduates. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(5), 551-568. Fung, D. (2017). A connected curriculum for higher education. London, UCL Press. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1558776/1/A-Connected-Curriculum-for-Higher-Education.pdf Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the changing nature of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 4-14. Griffiths, R. (2004). Knowledge production and the research-teaching nexus: the case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 709-726 Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. York: Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/node/3146 Healey, M., Flint, A., and Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education, York: Higher Education Academy https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher-education Healey, M., Jenkins, A., & Lea, J. (2014). Developing research-based curricula in college-based higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.  https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/heinfe/Developing_research-based_curricula_in_CBHE Jenkins, A., & Healey, M. (2016). Reshaping understandings, practices and policies to enhance the links between teaching and research. In P. John and J. Fanghanel (Eds.) Dimensions of marketization in higher education. (pp. 164-174). London: Routledge. Jenkins, A., Healey, M., & Zetter, R. (2007). Linking teaching and research in departments and disciplines. York: Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/node/3890 Kuh, G.D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Levy, P. (2011). Embedding inquiry and research into mainstream higher education: A UK perspective, CUR Quarterly, 32(1), 36-42. http://www.cur.org/DOWNLOAD.ASPX?ID=2803