Student Course Representatives: Voice and Power

Session Time and Location

Fri, 8 Jun 2018
9:45am to 11:15am
Room: Room:
Dunwoody A
Session Track
Session Format



The democratisation of HE has transformed the way that students and universities interrelate, characterised by a re-distribution of power and new ways of working and learning together. As part of this development, the role of Course Representative (CR) is increasingly viewed as an agent for the student voice across the sector. However, there is an emerging critique which challenges assumptions that representation is inherently ‘good’ and calls for deeper, critical examination of the CR role. This paper presents empirical work which explores how voice and power play out in the experiences of CRs at a modern university in the UK.

  • Session References +

    Bols, A. (2015) Enhancing Student Representation systems.  Accessed: (accessed 01.06.2017)

    Healey, M. Flint, A., Harrington, K. (2014) Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Academy.

    Kezar, A. (2005). Promoting Student Success: The Importance of Shared Leadership and Collaboration. Occasional Paper No. 4. Bloomington. Accessed:

    Luescher‐Mamashela, T. (2010) From University Democratisation to Managerialism: The changing legitimation of university governance and the place of students, Tertiary Education and Management, 16:4, 259-283.

    Robinson, C. (2012). Student engagement: What does this mean in practice in the context of higher education institution? Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 4, 2, 94-108.

    Seale, J. (2010). Doing student voice work in higher education: an exploration of the value of participatory methods. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 6, 995-1015.

    Stockerner, D. (2012). Students’ political engagement: a comprehensive study of University of Ottawa undergraduate students. Journal of Youth Studies, 15, 8, 1028-1047.