Using Student Perception Research to Inform Educational Development Work

Session Time and Location

Date:
Wed, 6 Jun 2018
Time:
Time:
4:30pm to 5:30pm
Room: Room:
Maplewood A
Session Track
Session Format

Participants will engage with research about student learning preferences in order to understand student perception of teaching strategies within a given context.  The study, conducted by the presenter, examined the preferred learning methods of the undergraduate international student population utilized in first-year seminars at a large, four-year, primarily non-residential research university in the United States. We will discuss the methodologies and findings, including strategies that students found “most helpful” for their learning.  Participants will then develop a plan for their own student-centered research that will inform their work with faculty. We will ground our discussion in research about inclusive pedagogies.

  • Session References +

    Austin AE. 1990. Faculty Cultures, Faculty Values. New Directions For Institutional Research. 17(4): 61 - 74.

    Brown, L. (2008, January 1). The incidence of study-related stress in international students in the initial stage of the international sojourn. Journal of Studies in International Education, 12 (1), 5-28.

    The Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST), http://www.cast.org/udl/

    Chalmers, D., & Gardiner, D. (2015). “An evaluation framework for identifying the effectiveness and impact of academic teacher development programmes.” Studies in Educational Evaluation, 46, 81-91.

    Eberle, J. H., & Childress, M. D. (2007, January 1). Universal design for culturally-diverse online learning.

    Hung, H.-L. (2007, March 8). What is missing in US higher education: Looking into the learning experiences of Asian international students from cognitive and sociocultural perspectives. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 3 (2), 168-192.

    Hurney CA, Brantmeier, EJ, Good, MR, Harrison D, and Meixner, C. 2016. “The Faculty Learning Outcome Assessment Framework.” Journal of Faculty Development. 30(2): 69-77.

    Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1994). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    King-Sears, M. (2009, December 7). Universal design for learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32 (4), 199-201.

    Madge, C., Raghuram, P., & Noxolo, P. Themed Issue: Postcoloniality, Responsibility and Care. (2009, January 1). Engaged pedagogy and responsibility: A postcolonial analysis of international students. Geoforum, 40 (1), 34-45.

    Shaw, R. (2011, June 16). Employing universal design for instruction. New Directions for Student Services, 134, 21-33.

    Spencer, A. (2003, July 1). Facilitating the academic success of international students. Teaching Theology and Religion, 6 (3), 164-168.

    Team-Based Learning Collaborative. Website. http://www.teambasedlearning.org/

    Turn to Your Neighbor. Blog. http://blog.peerinstruction.net/author/peerinstruction/

    UDL Guidelines Graphic Organizer. Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines/udlguidelines_graphicorganizer

    Yanyin, Z., & Yinan, M. (2010, January 1). Another look at the language difficulties of international students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14 (4), 371-388.